Fostering Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching via Analysis of Tasks and Student Work (2024)

  • 1.

    Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 314). CMESG/GCEDM.

  • 2.

    Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 332). Jossey-Bass.

  • 3.

    Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389407.

  • 4.

    Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479512.

  • 5.

    Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B. (2007). Designing and implementing authentic investigative proportional reasoning tasks: The impact on pre-service mathematics teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 333340.

  • 6.

    Berk, D., Taber, S. B., Gorowara, C. C., & Poetzl, C. (2009). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 113135.

  • 7.

    Blythe, T., Allen, D., & Powell, B. S. (2015). Looking together at student work. Teachers College Press.

  • 8.

    Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242.

  • 9.

    Carney, M. B., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., Hughes, G., & Sutton, J. (2016). Statewide mathematics professional development: Teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Educational Policy, 30(4), 539572.

  • 10.

    Charalambous, C. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding: An exploratory study. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 247278.

  • 11.

    Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2011, December 26). Progressions for the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. https://commoncoretools.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ccss_progression_rp_67_2011_11_12_corrected.pdf

  • 12.

    Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011, June 1). Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Mathematics Curriculum Materials Analysis Project. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://www.mathedleadership.org/docs/ccss/CCSSO%20Mathematics%20Curriculum%20Analysis%20Project.Whole%20Document.6.1.11.Final.docx.

  • 13.

    Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Lessons from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915945.

  • 14.

    Hatisaru, V., & Erbas, A. K. (2017). Mathematical knowledge for teaching the function concept and student learning outcomes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 703722.

  • 15.

    Hill, H., & Ball, D. L. (2009). The curious—and crucial—case of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 6871.

  • 16.

    Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372400.

  • 17.

    Hill, H. C., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794831.

  • 18.

    Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371406.

  • 19.

    Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2016). Promoting middle school students’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 193219.

  • 20.

    Hoover, M., Mosvold, R., Ball, D. L., & Lai, Y. (2016). Making progress on mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1&2), 334.

  • 21.

    Ilany, B., Keret, Y., & Ben-Chaim, D. (2004). Implementation of a model using authentic investigative activities for teaching ratio and proportion in pre-service teacher education. Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 8188). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237801780.

  • 22.

    Izsak, A., Jacobson, E., & de Araujo, Z. (2012). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions with drawn quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 391427.

  • 23.

    Jacob, R., Hill, H., & Corey, D. (2017). The impact of a professional development program on teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 379407.

  • 24.

    Johnson, E. M. S., & Larsen, S. P. (2012). Teacher listening: The role of knowledge of content and students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 117129.

  • 25.

    Kastberg, S. E., D’Ambrosio, B., & Lynch-Davis, K. (2012). Understanding proportional reasoning for teaching. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(3), 3240.

  • 26.

    Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics; Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203235.

  • 27.

    Leavy, A. M., & Hourigan, M. (2016). Using lesson study to support knowledge development in initial teacher education: Insights from early number classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 161175.

  • 28.

    Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93118). Erlbaum; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • 29.

    Lesseig, K. (2016). Investigating Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Proof in Professional Development. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 253270.

  • 30.

    Lobato, J., Orrill, C. H., Druken, B., & Jacobson, E. (2011, April 8–12). Middle school teachers’ knowledge of proportional reasoning for teaching [Paper presentation]. As part of the symposium, extending, expanding, and applying the construct of mathematical knowledge for teaching at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA.

  • 31.

    Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Hewson, P. W., & Love, N. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Corwin.

  • 32.

    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

  • 33.

    Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kayhan, M. (2009). An investigation of proportional reasoning skills of middle school students. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 2(1), 2648.

  • 34.

    Pianta, R. C., & Hamré, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom practices: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109119.

  • 35.

    Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 415.

  • 36.

    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 414.

  • 37.

    Smith, M. S., Bill, V., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Thinking through a lesson: Successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 132138.

  • 38.

    Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Education Researcher, 37(8), 469479.

  • 39.

    Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No.033). U. S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.

  • Fostering Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching via Analysis of Tasks and Student Work (2024)

    FAQs

    What is the mathematical task of teaching? ›

    Mathematical-task knowledge for teaching deals with the knowledge teachers need in order to (a) select and develop tasks to promote students' conceptual understanding of mathematics, support their development of mathematical thinking, and capture their interest and curiosity and (b) optimize the learning potential of ...

    What is mathematical knowledge for teaching? ›

    Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) encompasses abilities such as analyzing the student thinking that led to an incorrect answer, identifying the mathematical understanding a student does not yet have, and deciding how to best represent a mathematical idea so that it can be understood by students.

    What does it mean to teach mathematics for understanding according to the TMU framework? ›

    The framework calls for Teaching Mathematics for Understanding (TMU) • The framework suggests that there should be a balance of conceptual, procedural, strategies and reasoning, in a learning centred classroom.

    Why is teaching mathematics for understanding important? ›

    It assists and enables learners to make sense of mathematics. Learners who have a sound grasp of conceptual knowledge, when asked to justify their work, would not say, 'My teacher told me to do it like this' rather they will be able to explain the reasoning behind their work.

    What are the 8 mathematical practices in teaching math? ›

    Standards for Mathematical Practice
    • Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. ...
    • Reason abstractly and quantitatively. ...
    • Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. ...
    • Model with mathematics. ...
    • Use appropriate tools strategically. ...
    • Attend to precision. ...
    • Look for and make use of structure.
    Jul 25, 2023

    What is a cognitive task analysis in math? ›

    Cognitive Task Analysis means to teach students not just the content, but how to think about the content. For example, if a student is struggling in maths, rather than assigning more exercises you might teach the student to "see" the information through a drawing or manipulative.

    What are the 5 types of mathematical knowledge? ›

    In particular, we identify five forms of knowledge of advanced mathematics for teaching: peripheral, evolutionary, axiomatic, logical, and inferential.

    What are the 5 components of mathematical knowledge students should acquire? ›

    5 Critical Components For Mathematical Proficiency
    • CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING. ...
    • PROCEDURAL FLUENCY. ...
    • Request a sample of our high school math curriculum – enVision A|G|A (Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II)
    • STRATEGIC COMPETENCE. ...
    • Read 'Teaching for Understanding' by Dr. ...
    • ADAPTIVE REASONING. ...
    • PRODUCTIVE DISPOSITION.
    Dec 21, 2020

    How teachers should teach mathematics? ›

    The best strategy to use when teaching mathematics is to use a combination of well-proven strategies that have been devised over the years. These include explicit Instruction, cooperative learning, the flipped classroom, visual strategies, hands-on learning, strategic questioning, and scaffold learning.

    How do teachers promote conceptual understanding of the mathematics they teach? ›

    Making use of problem sequences and patterns in problem sets, explicitly calling out patterns during instruction, and posing questions that encourage students to spot underlying patterns can help students identify mathematical relationships and build conceptual understanding.

    What are the three principles of learning and teaching mathematics? ›

    Finally, I have formulated three pedagogical principles for designing and implementing mathematics curricula: the Concreteness Principle, the Necessity Principle, and the Generalizibility Principle.

    What are the three stages of mathematical understanding? ›

    As Easy as (Stage) 1, 2, 3. To help your child understand math well, all it takes is to think about teaching new concepts in three stages. (You may have seen this approach called the concrete, pictorial, and abstract progression. I prefer to phrase it this way because it makes the purpose of each stage clearer.

    How to develop mathematical understanding? ›

    7 Strategies to Teach Conceptual Understanding in Math
    1. Spiral Practice Through a Well-Thought-Out Scope and Sequence. ...
    2. Use High-Order Tasks to Build Critical Thinking Skills. ...
    3. Visual Representations for Better Retrieval. ...
    4. Manipulatives and Hands-On Learning. ...
    5. Connect Concepts Instead of Teaching Math Shortcuts.
    Apr 17, 2023

    Why is it important to teach mathematical proficiency? ›

    For students to develop conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, and adaptive reasoning, they need a productive disposition towards mathematics.

    How significant is mathematical thinking to teaching and learning mathematics? ›

    Mathematical thinking is important for teaching mathematics. Conjecturing and Convincing. Being able to use mathematical thinking in solving problems is one of the most the fundamental goals of teaching mathematics, but it is also one of its most elusive goals.

    What is the task of mathematics teacher? ›

    Math Teacher Responsibilities:

    Planning and presenting lessons to facilitate students' understanding and application of mathematical concepts. Preparing and distributing learning material such as notes, assignments, and quizzes. Sourcing the resources and supplies needed for lessons.

    What is the task method of teaching? ›

    A Task-Based approach offers an alternative for teachers who are interested in creating a more student-centered environment in their classroom. In a task-based class, the lesson is based on the completion of a central task and its presentation.

    What is the definition of a math task? ›

    In the framework, a task is defined as a seg- ment of classroom activity that is devoted to the development of a particular mathematical idea. A task can involve several related problems or extended work, up to an entire class period, on a single complex problem.

    What is the role of mathematics in teaching? ›

    Mathematics, often referred to as the language of the universe, plays a pivotal role in education and the development of young minds. It provides a framework for logical thinking, problem-solving, and critical analysis.

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Velia Krajcik

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5682

    Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

    Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Velia Krajcik

    Birthday: 1996-07-27

    Address: 520 Balistreri Mount, South Armand, OR 60528

    Phone: +466880739437

    Job: Future Retail Associate

    Hobby: Polo, Scouting, Worldbuilding, Cosplaying, Photography, Rowing, Nordic skating

    Introduction: My name is Velia Krajcik, I am a handsome, clean, lucky, gleaming, magnificent, proud, glorious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.